Gender Mainstreaming at the Parliament: A Study of the 2004-2009 House of Representatives (DPR) and House of Regional Representatives (DPD)
This study discovered that the biggest challenge to mainstreaming gender at the House of Representatives (DPR) are procedures of political parties, including that of their party groups at the DPR, which give their members no autonomy. Not only do the parliamentary groups at the DPR prevent their men and women members from voicing the aspiration of the people and constituents, they also determine the assignment of their members to the bodies of the house to either leadership or membership posts. Under this kind of structure, it is almost impossible for women to win the leadership or even membership posts at the house bodies, let alone there is a fact that the central management of party often interferes with direct appointments. Not surprisingly, there are very few women members leading the bodies of the 2004-2009 DPR. Lobbying, experience, argumentation, and the position of women in the structure of the party at central level are the biggest problem that women have to face in their aspiration to enter strategic posts.
The House of Regional Representatives (DPD) applies a different approach in filling the chairperson and membership posts of its bodies from that of the DPR. At the DPD, the individual capacity and networks of the candidate play a very decisive role. The absence of intervention from political parties creates a favorable condition for women members of the DPD to run for chairs and membership posts of the house bodies. The role of the bodies of the DPD are less political than those of th DPR, such that its women members also tends to be more collegial. One of the problems preventing women members of the DPD from optimising their role is limited individual and networking capacity when they are in Jakarta.